(301) 788-8198govcon@williamsonlawgroup.comBethesda, Maryland
Alaska Native Corporations

Counsel for Alaska Native Corporations and their 8(a) subsidiaries

We resolve federal procurement disputes for Alaska Native Corporations and their 8(a) subsidiaries, at SBA, at GAO, and at the Boards and Court of Federal Claims.

Alaska Native Corporations operate under a set of procurement rules that no other contractor shares.

ANC-owned 8(a) subsidiaries have sole-source authority, affiliation rules and program requirements of their own, and their awards draw close attention from competitors, contracting officers and SBA. When a protest, audit or dispute arrives, the response has to account for those rules from the start.

We represent ANCs and their subsidiaries in every forum that reviews federal procurement decisions, and we help structure the joint ventures, teaming agreements and mentor-protégé relationships that keep disputes from starting.

Talk to an attorney

Tell us about your matter and we will follow up.

Request a Consultation
Decision Points

Five decisions that shape an ANC dispute

Each one comes with a short window and a record that is hard to change later. We help you make the right call while it still counts.

A competitor challenges your size

Your response to the SBA area office is the filing that matters most. If the case goes to the Office of Hearings and Appeals, the judge generally decides it on the record you built at the area office, and new evidence is rarely allowed in.

You doubt the awardee’s eligibility

A size protest must usually be filed within five business days of learning who the apparent awardee is. If the awardee is itself an ANC subsidiary, SBA’s affiliation rules narrow the arguments available, so the decision to protest needs to be made quickly and carefully.

You lose a competition

Use the debriefing to learn whether real protest grounds exist, and whether winning would actually change who gets the award. A protest that cannot change the outcome is rarely worth the cost.

Your award is protested

The agency defends its procurement, not your award. Intervening lets you protect your own evaluation and the set-aside or sole-source decision behind it.

The agency directs work you did not price

Direction that departs from the contract terms or your pricing assumptions can be a constructive change. These costs add up fast, especially on remote or demanding sites, and they are recoverable when you document them while the work is underway.

Size and Eligibility

Protecting the eligibility your business plan depends on

Eligibility decides which contracts an ANC subsidiary can pursue and which awards it can keep. For ANCs, the questions look different than they do for other 8(a) participants.

Challenges to an ANC subsidiary’s ownership, control or disadvantaged status are sharply limited by statute and regulation, and SBA’s affiliation rules generally do not combine an ANC subsidiary with its parent or sister companies. Those protections are real, but they are not complete.

The challenge that remains is a direct one: whether the subsidiary itself meets the size standard for the specific contract. These cases turn on technical facts, move quickly, and are decided on the record built at the SBA area office. We build that record from the start, and we carry it through any appeal to the Office of Hearings and Appeals.

Where We Appear

Every forum that reviews your award

SBA

Size and status protests, and appeals to the Office of Hearings and Appeals

GAO

Bid protests and interventions

The Boards

Contract appeals at the ASBCA and CBCA

Court of Federal Claims

Bid protests and contract claims

What We Handle

Disputes and litigation

Bid protests

Protests and interventions at the agency, GAO and the Court of Federal Claims, including challenges to sole-source and set-aside awards.

SBA protests and appeals

Size and status protests, and appeals to SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals.

CDA claims

Requests for equitable adjustment and Contract Disputes Act claims, from certification through the Boards and the Court of Federal Claims.

Terminations

Termination for convenience settlement proposals and challenges to terminations for default.

Prime/sub disputes

Payment, scope and flowdown disputes between primes and subcontractors, on either side of the subcontract.

Miller Act litigation

Payment bond claims and suits on federal construction projects.

What We Handle

Compliance and investigations

Audits and investigations

DCAA and agency audits, Inspector General inquiries and internal investigations.

Suspension and debarment

Responses to show cause letters and proposed exclusions, and administrative agreements that keep you eligible for award.

CPAR responses

Rebuttals to inaccurate or unfair past performance evaluations before they follow you into the next competition.

What We Handle

Structuring and dispute avoidance

JV and teaming agreements

Joint ventures and teaming agreements built to meet SBA rules and hold up when the work starts.

Mentor-protégé agreements

Mentor-protégé agreements and the joint ventures formed under them.

Dispute avoidance

Contract review, notice letters and early strategy that resolve problems before they become claims.

Discuss your matter with an attorney

Tell us about your contract, protest or investigation, and an attorney will follow up.

Request a Consultation

(301) 788-8198govcon@williamsonlawgroup.com6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 300
Bethesda, MD 20817